4701 Oleander Drive, Suite A
Myrtle Beach, SC 29577
The answer is it depends. A sole proprietor may be covered by their own workers’ compensation policy or another company’s workers’ compensation policy, depending on whether:
In Ramirez v. May River Roofing, the SC Court of Appeals found that Ramirez, who was a sole proprietor and owner of a roofing company, was not covered by his own workers’ compensation policy because he did not notify the insurance company that he intended to be included as an employee.
SC Code Section 42-1-130 provides that a sole proprietor can be included in their own workers’ compensation policy, but they must notify the insurer of their decision to be included:
Any sole proprietor or partner of a business whose employees are eligible for benefits under this title may elect to be included as employees under the workers’ compensation coverage of the business if they are actively engaged in the operation of the business and if the insurer is notified of their election to be included. Any sole proprietor or partner, upon this election, is entitled to employee benefits and is subject to employee responsibilities prescribed in this title.
Although Ramirez purchased workers’ compensation insurance, and the policy listed him as the “insured,” he was not covered by his own policy because he did not notify the insurer of his election to be included.
The lesson – if you are a sole proprietor and you intend for your workers’ compensation policy to cover you as well as your employees, you must notify the insurance company in writing that you elect to include yourself as an employee.
The Court of Appeals did find that Ramirez had coverage, although it was not his own company’s policy.
At the time of his injury, Ramirez was performing roofing work for another company, May River Roofing. Ramirez claimed he was also an employee of May River, but May River claimed he was an independent contractor.
After analyzing the four factors used to determine whether a worker is a “direct employee” of another company, the Court of Appeals concluded that, in addition to being a sole proprietor, Ramirez was an employee of May River and therefore entitled to workers’ compensation coverage under May River’s policy for his injuries.
The Court found that “May River had the right to and exercised control over Ramirez in a manner consistent with an employment relationship,” where:
Although there was also evidence that Ramirez had a measure of independence in how he performed his work and that he set his own work hours, the Court found that this factor weighed in favor of finding that he was a direct employee.
The Court also found that the “furnishing equipment” factor weighed in favor of an employment relationship where:
The Court found that the “method of payment” factor weighed against an employment relationship because Ramirez was paid by the job and not by the hour.
The Court found that the “right to fire” factor did not weigh in either direction because the Court did not have sufficient information on their employment relationship or contracts.
Weighing the factors together, the Court of Appeals found that Ramirez was a direct employee of May River and therefore covered by May Rivers’ workers’ compensation insurance.
What can a sole proprietor who wants to make sure they are covered by workers’ compensation take from this opinion?
Your Myrtle Beach workers’ compensation attorney on the Axelrod team will help you to determine whether you are entitled to workers’ compensation coverage, help you to make your claim, and represent you before the workers’ compensation commission.
Fields marked with an * are required